More cases are brought concerning claims on property. Within the discussion of the cases, various issues come up – is one’s claim believed if he could have made a better claim (ma li lshaker)? That works as long as there aren’t witnesses against him. If part of the testimony in court is cancelled out because contradictory testimony is brought against it, do we throw out the entire claim or do we leave the part that wasn’t contradicted? If new evidence is brought which contradicts the evidence upon which the court ruled in favor of one side, should the court reverse its decision and take the land away or should they stick with the original decision because if they don’t, it will that cause people to lose respect for the courts?