Rashbag’s opinion in the mishna is discussed – what was he referring to when he said, “it goes by the local minhag?” \u00a0In what case does he disagree with Tanna Kamma? \u00a0Why does the mishna\u00a0need to specify that one witness in a get pashut is invalid – isn’t that obvious? \u00a0Two answers are brought. \u00a0According to one answer, the case is where there is one witness on the document and one who is not signed on the document but testifies about what is written in the document. \u00a0There is a debate about whether or not this case is valid. \u00a0One opinion brings as his proof a story relating to Rabbi Yirmiya and how he was allowed to reenter the Beit Midrash after being kicked out. \u00a0There are four versions about what case the story related to. \u00a0The mishna\u00a0discusses cases where there is a contradiction in the amount of money mentioned in the document. \u00a0Depending on the situation, there are different ways of deciding which amount is “correct.”<\/p>\n