{"id":3874,"date":"2017-01-09T09:16:41","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T07:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3874"},"modified":"2017-01-09T09:16:41","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T07:16:41","slug":"bava-metzia-105","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2017\/01\/bava-metzia-105\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Metzia 105"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rava raises issues regarding a heiter iska<\/em> that allows one to invest money for someone else in a way that they can share the profits. \u00a0Based on the way it is set up, that a loss will be split 50\/50 but gains 2\/3 to the borrower (the one investing the money) and 1\/3 to the investor, if one takes an investment and splits it into 2 documents, there can be a loss for the investor if one yields profit sand the other a loss. \u00a0And if 2 deals are put into one document, it can cause a loss for the borrower. \u00a0Various other investment issues are discussed. \u00a0If a sharecropper who pays a fixed amount to the owner decides not to weed the field, this is not allowed for various reasons cited in the mishna and gemara. \u00a0If one sharecrops for percentages and there is very little yield, he is not responsible. \u00a0The mishna and gemara discuss what the amount is. \u00a0From here the gemara digresses to various halachot regarding measurements in other areas of halacha including ritual impurity.<\/p>\n

\n