The mishna discusses a case where one rents a donkey and it gets seized by the king. \u00a0Rav and Shmuel disagree about the case and a tosefta is brought in to question Shmuel’s explanation. \u00a0Some answers are given. \u00a0The gemara then brings in sources that discuss situations where one rents and the item rented dies\/sinks halfway through. \u00a0The conclusions are questioned and the gemara tries to establish what the exact situation is in order to explain the halacha. \u00a0In the context of this discussion, a debate between Rav and Shmuel is brought about whether one can sell the carcass of an animal he rented in a way that the principal will no longer exist (meaning he can sell it and use the difference to rent a new animal). \u00a0Rav’s opinion is questioned by a tosefta and resolved. \u00a0A case is brought with a boat that was rented to carry wine sinks and the gemara discusses the particulars of the case – did he rent “this boat” or “a boat” and was it to carry “this wine” or “any wine.” \u00a0TWo other cases are brought which explain what more\u00a0rights of the renter – how much can he load on a donkey he rented to ride (and how much can the driver load) and if the donkey was rented to a man to ride on, can a woman ride instead or the reverse?<\/p>\n