{"id":3814,"date":"2016-12-12T09:26:40","date_gmt":"2016-12-12T07:26:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3814"},"modified":"2016-12-12T09:26:40","modified_gmt":"2016-12-12T07:26:40","slug":"bava-metzia-77","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/12\/bava-metzia-77\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Metzia 77"},"content":{"rendered":"

Various dealings in employer\/ worker relations are brought where a worker can’t do the job and depending on the circumstances (could he have anticipated from the beginning that may be the case?) it is assessed who should bear the responsibility. \u00a0RAbbi Dosa and the rabbis disagree abotu whether a worker who reneges on an agreement in the middle should always get paid for all the work he did or does he need to compensate the emplioyer in a case where the employer will now need to pay more to get workers to finish the second part. \u00a0Rav holds like Rabbi Dosa; however this seems to contradict a different statement that Rav said elsewhere. \u00a0Several answers are brought. \u00a0in that context, a braita is mentioned about a seller or buyer reneging after the buyer paid part of the money. \u00a0This case is also then discussed in the gemara.<\/p>\n

\n