{"id":3726,"date":"2016-10-28T08:24:31","date_gmt":"2016-10-28T06:24:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3726"},"modified":"2016-10-28T08:24:31","modified_gmt":"2016-10-28T06:24:31","slug":"bava-metzia-32","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/10\/bava-metzia-32\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Metzia 32"},"content":{"rendered":"

If one loses money from his work by taking a lost item, how do we determine what compensation he receives from the owner? \u00a0According to the mishna, if he wants to get his full salary, he needs stipulate that in front of three men. \u00a0A story is brought about a different case where there was a debate about whether it needed to be done before 3 men like the case in our mishna or two is sufficient. \u00a0If one finds an animal in a cowshed, it is not considered a lost item but in a public thoroughfare, it is. \u00a0More details of this are discussed in the gemara. \u00a0If one’s parent tells you to do something against what the Torah prescribes, one cannot listen to one’s parent. \u00a0The differences between loading and unloading are discussed. \u00a0Within the context of that conversation, Rava claims that the mitzva of tzaar baalei chayim<\/em> is prescribed by the Torah. \u00a0Various proofs and contradictory sources are brought.<\/p>\n

\n