{"id":3690,"date":"2016-10-07T08:16:19","date_gmt":"2016-10-07T06:16:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3690"},"modified":"2016-10-07T08:16:19","modified_gmt":"2016-10-07T06:16:19","slug":"bava-metzia-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/10\/bava-metzia-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Metzia 11"},"content":{"rendered":"

The gemara brings different explanations as to what Reish Lakish and Rabbi Yochanan are debating regarding a minor whether or not she can acquire through a chatzer<\/em> or not. \u00a0The mishna raises a case where an animal was running and ran into someone’s courtyard. \u00a0He can acquire is by saying “my field acquired it” as long as the animal can’t run very fast (i.e. has a broken leg). \u00a0Shmuel and others qualify the mishna and says it only works if the owner is standing nearby and that assumes that we are referring to an unprotected field (in a protected field one would not need to be standing by). \u00a0The gemara attempts to bring a proof for this but rejects the proof. \u00a0 Rabbi Abba raises a\u00a0question against this position from a mishna. \u00a0Various explanations of the mishna are brought to\u00a0resolve\u00a0the contradiction.<\/p>\n

\n