{"id":3652,"date":"2016-09-20T08:12:57","date_gmt":"2016-09-20T06:12:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3652"},"modified":"2016-09-20T08:12:57","modified_gmt":"2016-09-20T06:12:57","slug":"bava-kamma-112","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/09\/bava-kamma-112\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Kamma 112"},"content":{"rendered":"

The different opinions of amoraim regarding whether or not the owner gave up or whether an inheritor is considered like a buyer (that if the owner gives up on getting the item back and it changes hands from the robber to another person, he acquires the item legally) are questioned based on tannaitic sources on this topic. \u00a0Since the tannaitic sources raise the issue of cases in which minors would or wouldn’t be responsible, the issue of whether one can have a judgement without one side appearing is raised (since a minor cannot appear in court). \u00a0There are different opinions about the matter and\u00a0the amoraim explain the circumstances under which one can have a court session without the other side appearing.<\/p>\n

\n