{"id":3650,"date":"2016-09-19T08:23:27","date_gmt":"2016-09-19T06:23:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3650"},"modified":"2016-09-19T08:23:27","modified_gmt":"2016-09-19T06:23:27","slug":"bava-kamma-111","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/09\/bava-kamma-111\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Kamma 111"},"content":{"rendered":"

The case of stealing from a convert who subsequently dies and the money as well as the sacrifice is brought to the kohen. \u00a0Cases are brought where the money and the sacrifice are brought to 2 different rotations of kohanim and what is done is discussed and argued depending on the situation. \u00a0The asham<\/em> brought after stealing is compared to the asham<\/em> brought for meila<\/em> – misuse of consecrated property. \u00a0The tenth perek starts with a discussion of someone who eats the stolen item from the\u00a0robber – can the owner demand the money back from the one who consumed it\u00a0or only from the\u00a0robber himself. \u00a0It depends on whether or not the owner has given up on getting his item back or not. \u00a0In the case where he gave up, the owner cannot demand it from the one who consumed it\u00a0as the combination of the owner\u00a0having given up and the change of ownership allows it to change ownership and therefor the original owner has no claim with the third party – he can only claim it from the robber. \u00a0But if he had not given up, then the one who consumed is considered as if he stole it from the original owner as it was still in his possession at the time of consumption.<\/p>\n

\n