{"id":3549,"date":"2016-07-08T08:14:38","date_gmt":"2016-07-08T06:14:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/?p=3549"},"modified":"2016-07-08T08:14:38","modified_gmt":"2016-07-08T06:14:38","slug":"bava-kamma-38","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dafyomi4women.org\/daf\/2016\/07\/bava-kamma-38\/","title":{"rendered":"Bava Kamma 38"},"content":{"rendered":"

If either the injured animal or the one that injures is hekdesh, there is no payment. \u00a0If the animal who is injured belongs to a Canaanite, there is no payment. \u00a0However if the reverse is true, the Caananite\u00a0must pay. \u00a0The Meiri limits this halacha and explains that the\u00a0Caananite\u00a0reference in the mishna would not be applicable\u00a0to non Jews in his day (and not in ours either). \u00a0The sources of these laws are derived from verses. \u00a0Does a non Jew get rewarded for learning Torah or keeping the seven Noahide laws? \u00a0 What is appropriate and not appropriate to be said to someone mourning a loss? \u00a0A difference of opinion is brought. \u00a0 A discussion of the merits of Amon and Moav is brought and what lesson can be learned from them. \u00a0How do we treat the Samaritans in terms of laws of damages – like non Jews or like Jews?<\/p>\n

\n