What is the reason for the takana of Rabban Gamliel and how does it connect to the issue of in front of how many people does he need to cancel the get. \u00a0If one goes against the takana of Rabban Gamliel and cancels a get in a court (or in a court in a different city) is the get cancelled or not? \u00a0Do Rabbis have the power to override Torah law? \u00a0The \u00a0gemara explains that the Rabbis have the power to uproot the marriage in this case because the husband didn’t keep to their rules regarding marriage and therefore didn’t keep to his conditions of “k’dat moshe v’yisrael” that he accepted when he got married. \u00a0To what extent can this concept be applied\u00a0has important ramifications. \u00a0If one cancels testimony, does he need to cancel it in front of all those who he told it to? \u00a0Is gilui da’at – if his intent is clear without him actually saying tha he is cancelling the get – effective in cancelling a get? \u00a0this is one of the 6 cases where we hold like Abaye over Rava. \u00a0He holds that it is ineffective.<\/p>\n